Executive Summary

In the United States, it is estimated that 20.9% of adults experience chronic pain 1, with an annual economic impact ranging from $560 to $635 billion. 2 When pain is not effectively treated, it can have a detrimental effect on quality of life, impacting physical, social, and emotional well-being. Pain can be managed through various treatment modalities, such as medications, procedures, physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and other interventions. Prescription medications play an integral role in improving the quality of life for millions of Americans living with acute or chronic pain. However, one of the most serious public health problems in our country is the dependence on opioid medications, which are often used in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. A percentage of patients with chronic pain who use opioids may develop an opioid use disorder, which can have devastating and lifelong consequences if not addressed.

It was reported in 2010 that Americans, constituting only 4.6% of the world’s population, have been consuming 80% of the global opioid supply, and 99% of the global hydrocodone supply, as well as two-thirds of the world’s illegal drugs 3 and, approximately 2 million Americans lived with prescription opioid abuse or dependence in 2013. 4 As of 2023, data indicates that nearly 8.6 million Americans aged 12 years and older report misusing prescription opioids. In 2014, prior to the drafting of the original SEMP guidelines, 47,055 drug overdose deaths occurred in the United States, 5 and over time, the number of annual drug overdose deaths has climbed to 80,391, with synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, accounting for 48,422 of these drug overdose deaths (~60%) in 2024. 6 When these guidelines were initially developed in 2016, the number of deaths attributed to semi-synthetic/natural opioids such as morphine and oxycodone was 14,487. 5 Although overdose deaths have continued to rise, the number of deaths attributed to semi-synthetic/natural opioids has since decreased to 8,006 deaths in 2024. 7 While the number of overdose deaths has increased from 2014 to 2024, we are seeing drastic declines in the number of overdose deaths from December 2023 to December 2024, at an estimated 26.9% decrease for the nation and 43.5% decrease for the state of West Virginia, which is the highest rate of decrease in the nation. Various efforts at multiple levels in treatment and prevention,, including but certainly not limited to the use of the original Safe and Effective Management of Guidelines in the management of chronic pain, have contributed to this dramatic reduction in the number of lives lost to drug overdose in West Virginia.

To provide a bit of historical context on the treatment of chronic pain leading to this opioid epidemic, in the 1990s, pain was introduced as the “fifth vital sign,” which was accompanied by pharmaceutical company efforts to market directly to prescribers, at times with misinformation regarding the risks of dependence and addiction, leading to significantly higher amounts of opioids being prescribed. 8 Furthermore, studies have shown a strong and consistent linear relationship between the amount of opioids sold and distributed and the morbidity and mortality associated with these chemicals. 9 The rise in people developing opioid use disorder and death rates associated with the use of opioids, both prescription and illicit, has deemed this opioid crisis a national epidemic.

As with any epidemic, the usual course of action is to rid the population of the condition, which includes prevention, treatment, and elimination of the source of the problem. Prevention of opioid overdose includes strategies such as education on appropriate pain management with or without opioid prescription medications, increasing the awareness and availability of opioid reversal agents as the antidote for respiratory failure and eventual death from inappropriate opioid use. Addressing this national epidemic includes timely diagnosing through regular screening, referring or providing the appropriate treatment for those experiencing a substance use disorder (as per DSM-5-TR, formerly known as addiction), whether through psychological therapy and/or medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Further strategies, such as proper opioid medication storage and disposal, are vital to ensure safe use of prescription medications, including opioids which are to be used only by the individual for whom they are prescribed.

In the original writing of this document, the national average rate of drug overdose deaths in the United States was 14.7 per 100,000, and West Virginia (WV) had the highest national state-by-state drug overdose death rate of 35.5 per 100,000 (age-adjusted) in 2014.5 According to more recent data, in 2023, West Virginia remained the state with the highest drug overdose death rate, with a rate of 81.9 overdose deaths per 100,000 (age-adjusted), and the national rate has climbed to 31.3 per 100,000. 10 As a result, WV continues to receive funding from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) aimed to maximize Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs), provide community or Insurer/Health System Interventions, and conduct policy evaluations. 11 The funding aided to coordinate the formation of a geographically and professionally diverse expert panel of West Virginia professionals with intentions of building upon the CDC Chronic Pain Opioid Guidelines of 2016 to:

  • Develop clinical pain management guidelines based on best practices, clinical experience, and evidence-based literature.
  • Develop a risk reduction strategy for the appropriate use of opioid prescription pain medications to improve health outcomes.

More recently, in 2022, the CDC updated its Opioid Guidelines. The 2022 CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain are intended for clinicians managing outpatient acute, subacute, and chronic pain in individuals >18 years of age. This guidance is not intended for those patients who are experiencing sickle cell disease-associated pain, palliative care, end-of-life care, and cancer-related pain. In contrast to the 2016 guidance, the update expands the audience to all practitioners whose scope of practice may include prescribing opioids in the outpatient setting. 12 The 2022 Guidelines are designed to be flexible, enabling patient-centered treatment decisions that considers an individual’s expected health outcomes and overall well-being. For instance, although evidence for increasing opioids beyond 50 MME daily yields diminishing pain benefit returns, it is not intended to be a mandatory threshold, and clinicians should carefully evaluate the decision to increase dosages by weighing risks versus benefits if increasing beyond 50 MMEs daily. 13

In addition to the clinical applications of this overall pain management guidance, which uses the 2022 CDC guidelines as a foundation, there is also an educational value from incorporating the SEMP Guidelines as a mandatory and significant component of all healthcare professional school curricula. Furthermore, the education can be incorporated into continuing educational programs for current healthcare professionals. Adapting to updated treatment guidelines for chronic medical conditions, such as pain, diabetes, or hypertension, is critical to the advancement of patient care. The ongoing collaboration and education of legislators, law enforcement, the healthcare community, and the public are essential to addressing this ongoing public health crisis.

The original 2016 WV pain management SEMP guidelines were developed by the following expert pain management panel to build upon the principles outlined in the CDC guidelines. Many of the recommendations from this expert panel are still considered beneficial and effective; therefore, a full reworking of the guidelines was unnecessary. However, updates were needed to ensure the guidelines were consistent with the most up-to-date information from the CDC in the 2022 guidelines. Therefore, a task force was assembled to update the 2016 SEMP Guidelines, resulting in the creation of this updated version.

The 2025 SEMP Guidelines are a summary of the work and efforts put forth by the expert pain management panel in 2016 and a task force responsible for updating the 2016 guidance to be consistent with the 2022 CDC guidelines. The intent of the members of both the expert panel and taskforce is not only improving human quality of life but also saving lives by promoting the values of safely and effectively managing pain for those suffering.

2016 Expert Pain Management Panel Members
Panel MemberOrganization/Title
Timothy Deer, MD (Chairperson)Centers for Pain Relief President/CEO, & INS President
Richard Vaglienti, MD (Vice Chairperson)WVU Pain Management Specialist
Mark Garofoli, PharmD, MBA (Coordinator)West Virginia University (WVU) School of Pharmacy, Assistant Professor
Jimmy Adams, DOActive Physical Medicine & Pain Center
Vicki Cunningham, RPhWV Bureau of Medical Services, Pharmacy Services Director
Matt Cupp, MDBoard Certified Pain Management Specialist
Michael GoffWest Virginia Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, Administrator
Richard Gross, PhDWVU Pain Management Psychologist
Rahul Gupta, MDWest Virginia DHHR, Public Health Commissioner & State Health Officer
Bradley Hall, MDWV Medical Professionals Health Program Executive Medical Director
Denzil Hawkinberry, MDCommunity Care of West Virginia Pain Specialist
James Jeffries, MSWV DHHR, Division of Infant, Child, & Adolescent Health, Director
Patty Johnston, RPhColony Drug & Wellness Center, Former Owner (Beckley)
Felice Joseph, RPhPEIA Pharmacy Director
Michael Mills, DOWest Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services Director
Ahmet Ozturk, MDMarshall University & Huntington Pain Specialist
Charles Ponte, PharmD, CPRWVU Schools of Pharmacy & Medicine
Jason Roush, DDSWest Virginia State Dental Director
Stephen Small, RPh, MSRational Drug Therapy Program Director
Stacey Wyatt, RNSt. Francis Hospital Pain Specialist
2025 Guideline Updates Task Force Members
Panel MemberOrganization/Title
Richard Vaglienti, MD (Chairperson)WVU Pain Management Specialist
David Didden, MD (Vice Chairperson)WV Department of Health/West Virginia Office of Maternal, Child and Family Health Medical Director for Overdoes Prevention
Alesha Heil, PharmD, MBA (Coordinator)Rational Drug Therapy Program/Special Programs Manager
Ryan Archer, PharmD, MBARational Drug Therapy Program, Academic Detailer Pharmacist
Kristen Boustany, PharmDWV Bureau of Medical Services, Pharmacy Services Pharmacist
Mark Garofoli, PharmD, MBA, BCGP, CPE, CTTSWVU School of Pharmacy, Director of Experiential Learning and Clinical Associate Professor WVU Medicine, Clinical Pain/Addiction Pharmacist
Felice Joseph, RPhWV Public Employees Insurance Agency, Pharmacy Director
Nicholas Kotov, PharmDRational Drug Therapy Program, Academic Detailer Pharmacist
Lisa Newell, D.O.WV Public Employees Insurance Agency, Medical Director
Angela Wowzcuk, Pharm.D., BCPS, AAHIVERational Drug Therapy Program, Director Service Assistand Professor WVU School of Pharmacy

A special thanks to Mary Taylor, student pharmacist, Katlyn Moore, program assistant, Jonah Moore, pharmacist, Brian Dye, SEMPP pharmacist, and the WVU Medicine legal team for their extensive efforts in document review and editing.

Risk Reduction Strategy

A major concern of healthcare professionals and patients alike is the question of what the “gold standard” approach to managing pain, especially chronic pain, is. Pain management strategies have been largely based upon subjective evaluation methods versus more objective assessments. Treatments derived from a more objective approach (i.e., hypertension and hyperlipidemia) will be viewed more positively by all constituencies due to the higher evidence of data supporting them. This section of the overall pain management guidance, included herein and in no particular order, provides healthcare professionals with a risk reduction process that will improve patient care and minimize provider anxiety.

1. Risk Screenings

Prior to starting opioid therapy and periodically during the continuation of therapy, clinicians should evaluate risks for opioid-related harms and discuss risks with patients. Certain risk factors, such as sleep-disordered breathing, renal and hepatic insufficiency, age, mental health comorbidities, and several others, are likely to increase susceptibility to opioid-related harms and should also be routinely monitored. 12 There are several screening tools with good predictive value that have been developed specifically to screen for risk of opioid misuse in the context of chronic pain treatment. Although more in-depth research on evidence may be needed 13, these tools may be useful in determining relative risk, in addition to the medical history.

  1. Patients Being Considered for Opioid Therapy
    1. Opioid Risk Tool, OUD (ORT-OUD)* (Appendix 1.1)
    2. Drug Abuse Screening Test, DAST (Appendix 1.2)
    3. Diagnosis, Intractability, Risk, & Efficacy Score, DIRE (Appendix 1.3)
  2. Patients Already Receiving Opioid Therapy
    1. Current Opioid Misuse Measure, COMM (Appendix 1.4)
    2. Pain Medication Questionnaire, PMQ (Appendix 1.5)
    3. Prescription Drug Use Questionnaire, PDUQ (Appendix 1.6)

 *Can be utilized for both patients being considered and already receiving opioid therapy

The use of a risk screening tool ultimately aims to assist in selecting the safest treatment options for each patient. The higher the risk of opioid-related harms for any individual patient, the less appropriate the use of controlled substances is because of their habit-forming or abuse tendencies, and an increased need for counseling and monitoring the respective patient for the given risk factors.

2. Drug Interaction & Pharmacogenomics Review

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is the study of the role of genetics in drug response. In general, there can be genetic variability in multiple physiological systems of the human body (i.e., hepatic enzymes, drug receptors, drug transport genes, etc.), resulting in altered drug responses. Three of the most common hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes that have shown distinct differences in genetic variability are 2C9, 2C19, and 2D6. 2C9 substrates include pain medications such as ibuprofen and celecoxib, while 2C19 substrates include diazepam, and 2D6 substrates include codeine, dextromethorphan, tramadol, duloxetine, venlafaxine, and tricyclic antidepressants. A chart illustrating the PGx metabolic differences within the population is available in Appendix 2.0. 14

When available and appropriate to the treatment regimen, genetic testing can help better predict an appropriate response to a medication such as codeine or tramadol. A CYP2D6 poor metabolizer may not receive adequate analgesia from codeine or tramadol. In contrast, an ultra-rapid metabolizer may experience unnecessary side effects (or even overdose) because of having more of the active metabolites present. This scenario emphasizes the need to not only review a patient’s medication regimen for drug-drug interactions, but also drug-gene interactions if that information is available.

To best treat patients in pain with these types of medications, common pharmacogenetic tests can be performed on blood, saliva, or cheek swabs by multiple testing companies. Patients should be reminded of the special privacy protections for their personal genetic information under the Genetic Information & Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008. 15 Testing typically costs a few hundred dollars and may be covered by third-party payers. Pharmacogenetic medication dosage guidelines are available via the PharmGKB website at: www.pharmgkb.org.

3. Patient & Provider(s) Agreements

In order to encourage and emphasize the importance of proper use of any pain medications, it is important to make sure that both the patient and the provider(s) have reviewed the realistic expectations of therapy (pain reduction and improved functional status). Establishing a “Patient and Provider Agreement” (also referred to as a patient contract) is an invaluable tool to ensure a mutual commitment from the patient and the provider(s) to achieve and maintain treatment goals, while also stating any reasons for agreement termination.

4. Pain Reduction and Function Improvement Goal

Pain should be thoroughly evaluated before prescribing medications or other treatments. Successful treatment of chronic pain involves a long-term process of monitoring and adjusting treatment, as necessary. A patient’s functional status, including activities of daily living, is often severely affected by pain. Inadequate treatment can considerably affect a patient’s quality of life or cause them to display drug-seeking behaviors when they are only seeking relief from chronic pain.

5. End of Therapy Goal

Any S.M.A.R.T. Goals (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Timely) have a foundation around being able to be measurable in accordance with time. Thus, when setting appropriate pain management goals with patients, a timely plan of action is required to achieve and maintain a reduction in pain. With the acute management of pain, it is recommended to develop an end-of-therapy goal for any pain management medication based on the expected time frame of the healing process. Pain may become chronic in some cases; however, for the management of acute pain syndromes (i.e., fractures, etc.), there should be an end-of-therapy goal for pharmacological management to prevent any unnecessary long-term issues (i.e., adverse effects, dependency, etc.) whenever possible. In chronic pain management, these goals may be more difficult since the resolution of the syndrome, or the elimination of pain, is not expected to occur.

6. Psychological Evaluation

Psychological distress commonly interferes with the improvement of pain and function; therefore, performing a psychological evaluation may help clinicians improve overall pain treatment. For example, depression and stress are significant risk factors for worsening pain, and both can change with alterations in life circumstances. Using appropriate tools allows for objective quantification of benefits with opioids, i.e., improvement in perceived disability, pain-related worry, mood, and pain reduction. In some settings, when a patient has co-morbid mental health conditions, medication may be optimized to treat both pain and mental health disorders, such as depression, and certain medications used in mental health disorders (such as benzodiazepines) should be avoided so as not to exacerbate adverse effects of their analgesic therapy. 12 When treating both conditions, careful documentation should be noted during the evaluation process.

Currently, the PHQ-2 depression screening instrument (Appendix 5.1) is a commonly suggested screening tool for depression, which is followed up with the PHQ-9 depression screen (Appendix 5.2). The purpose of the PHQ-2 is not to establish a final diagnosis or to monitor depression severity, but rather to screen for depression as a “first step” approach. Patients who screen positive should be further evaluated with the PHQ-9 to determine whether they meet criteria for a depressive disorder. Another useful depression screening is the Beck Depression Inventory, which is provided in Appendix 5.3.

7. Proper Medication Storage & Disposal

Healthcare professionals play a major role in educating patients, and that education is very important for the topic of proper medication storage and disposal. It is essential to educate patients to store medications in a secure location, out of the reach and sight of children and pets, and to put medicines away after each use. Even simple measures, such as ensuring the safety cap is locked, can help prevent accidents. Patients need to be educated that if an accidental ingestion does occur, one should contact the Poison Center (1-800-222-1222) immediately or dial 911 if a person is exhibiting signs of an overdose or having a seizure.

Remind patients to store their medications in a cool, dry area. Since heat and humidity can alter medications, a bathroom is not a suitable location to store medications. Patients should be encouraged to use lockable storage, such as a safe, cabinet, or drawer, when applicable. Patients should also be reminded to take only the number of doses needed when leaving home or traveling. Overall, there is a need to emphasize inaccessibility for anyone besides the intended patient.The FDA recommends that most prescription medications be returned through a DEA-sponsored Take-Back Program, a DEA-Authorized collector (https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubdispsearch) or throwing away in household trash by removing medications from the original container and mixing with an undesirable substance (i.e., coffee grounds, dirt, etc.) in a sealable container or bag. For a small number of medications, the FDA recommends immediate removal from the home by flushing them down the toilet or sink (Appendix 6.0). To dispose of a drug patch, carefully remove it by the edges and avoid touching the used medicine pad; then fold the patch in half, sticky sides together.

Currently, the PHQ-2 depression screening instrument (Appendix 5.1) is a commonly suggested screening tool for depression, which is followed up with the PHQ-9 depression screen (Appendix 5.2). The purpose of the PHQ-2 is not to establish a final diagnosis or to monitor depression severity, but rather to screen for depression as a “first step” approach. Patients who screen positive should be further evaluated with the PHQ-9 to determine whether they meet criteria for a depressive disorder. Another useful depression screening is the Beck Depression Inventory, which is provided in Appendix 5.3.

8. Opioid Reversal Agent Prescribing & Administration

Naloxone 18 and Nalmefene 19 are opioid reversal agents utilized for acute opiate overdose and are available for use in the United States. Both agents reverse respiratory depression associated with opioid overdose. Both agents act as competitive opioid receptor antagonists, thereby reversing the respiratory depression induced by opioids. When compared to naloxone, nalmefene has a longer duration of action and a higher affinity for opioid receptors. 20 Naloxone was approved in March 2023 as an over-the-counter medication and is accessible to all.23 If cost is a limiting factor to obtaining over-the-counter naloxone, it can be prescribed by a healthcare provider or via standing order at any pharmacy in West Virginia and billed to insurance. Naloxone is available in multiple formulations including a 0.4mg/ml injection, 0.4mg/ml auto-injection, 4mg/10ml injection, 2mg/2ml injection, 5mg/0.5ml injection, 0.4mg/ml pre-filled syringe, 2mg/2ml intranasal solution, 3 mg/0.1 ml nasal spray, 4mg/0.1ml nasal spray, 8mg/0.1ml nasal spray, 10mg/0.1ml nasal spray, and 4mg/0.25ml nasal spray. Nalmefene is available in a 1 mg/ml injection, as well as a 2.7mg/0.1ml intranasal solution. 

Naltrexone is another opioid antagonist available in the United States, but it is not indicated for opioid overdose reversal. The long-acting injectable formulation is utilized for the treatment of opioid use disorder, and is contraindicated in patients with current physiologic opioid dependence or currently receiving opioid analgesics. To avoid precipitated withdrawal, an opioid-free washout period of 7-10 days is strongly recommended; and for patients taking longer-acting opioids, 14 days may be necessary. See drug label information for additional contraindications, warnings, and precautions.

  • Patient/family/friend candidates for being prescribed take-home opioid antagonists (Appendix 7.1)
  • SAMHSA Naloxone Administration Guidelines (Appendix 7.2)

In March of 2016, at the request of the governor, the 2016 legislature passed Senate Bill 431, available online at www.legis.state.wv.us, authorizing licensed pharmacists or pharmacy interns (working under the guidance of licensed pharmacists) to dispense an opioid antagonist without a prescription (West Virginia Code §16-46-1, et seq.). 21 A pharmacist or pharmacy intern who dispenses an opioid antagonist without a prescription shall report the dispensing in the PDMP and provide patient counseling (mandatory which the patient may not opt out) to the individual for whom the opioid antagonist is dispensed regarding, but not limited to:

  • Proper administration;
  • Importance of contacting emergency services (i.e., calling 911) as soon as practicable, either before or after administering the opioid antagonist;
  • Risks associated with failure to contact emergency services following administration of an opioid antagonist;
  • Providing educational materials on opioid-related overdose prevention and treatment, and opioid antagonist administration (materials developed by the WV Board of Pharmacy).

For more information: http://stopoverdose.org/index.htm

For substance use disorder (addiction) and especially if one was in a scenario where naloxone was administered (whether personally, family, or friend), sources of help and education include:

  • 1-844-HELP-4-WV (1-844-495-7498)
  • SAMHSA Helpline: 1-800-662-4357 (1-800-662-HELP)
  • Veterans Crisis Line: 1-800-273-8255, Option 1
  • Narcotics Anonymous (Personal): 818-700-0700
  • Nar-Anon (Family/Friends): 1-800-477-6291
  • WV Medical Professionals Health Program (Health Professionals): 304-933-1030
9. Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) Use

Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), also known as Controlled Substance Monitoring Programs (CSMPs), must be fully utilized to reach their potential in controlling prescription drug abuse and diversion. All 50 states have some form of an operating PDMP; however, prescribers and dispensers are subject to different reporting requirements per state law. Based on data from national surveys and information, the best practices for any state in utilizing a PDMP 12:

  • PDMP data should be reviewed before every initial opioid prescription for acute, subacute or chronic pain
  • At a minimum, during long-term opioid therapy, PDMP data should be reviewed before an initial opioid prescription and then at least every 3 months or more frequent monitoring whenever practical should be considered.
  • Clinicians should review PDMP data specifically for prescription opioids and other controlled medications patients have received from additional prescribers to determine whether a patient is receiving total opioid dosages or combinations (e.g., opioids combined with benzodiazepines) that put the patient at risk for overdose.
  • PDMP-generated risk scores have not been validated against clinical outcomes such as overdose and should not take the place of clinical judgment.
  • Clinicians should not dismiss patients from their practice based solely on PDMP information, as other physicians may be working at the same practice or providing coverage during a physician’s absence. Doing so can adversely affect patient safety and could result in missed opportunities to provide potentially lifesaving information (e.g., about risks of prescription opioids and overdose prevention) and interventions (e.g., safer prescriptions, nonopioid pain treatment, and effective treatment for substance use disorders.
  • Consider the total MME/day for concurrent opioid prescriptions to help assess the patient’s overdose risk. In the context of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), buprenorphine should not be counted in the total MME/day in calculations because of its partial agonist properties at opioid receptors that confer a ceiling effect on respiratory depression.  However, in the context of pain management, buprenorphine can require calculations of MME (see Morphine Milligram Equivalents MMEs Special Considerations: Methadone and Buprenorphine for Pain Management Handout for additional information). If a patient is found to be receiving total daily dosages of opioids that put them at risk for overdose, discuss safety concerns with the patient, consider, in collaboration with the patient, whether or not the benefits of tapering outweigh the risks of tapering, and offer naloxone.
  • Discuss safety concerns with other clinicians who are prescribing controlled substances for the patient. Ideally, clinicians should first discuss concerns with the patient and inform them that they plan to coordinate care with their other clinicians to improve the patient’s safety.
  • Screen for substance use and discuss concerns with the patient in a nonjudgmental manner.
  • When diverting (sharing or selling prescription opioids and not taking them) might be likely, consider toxicology testing to assist in determining whether prescription opioids can be discontinued without causing withdrawal. A negative toxicology test for prescribed opioids might indicate the patient is not taking prescribed opioids. However, clinicians should consider other reasons for this test result (e.g., false-negative results or misinterpretation of results).

West Virginia code regarding the mandatory use of the PDMP is provided in Appendix 8.0 and is available online at www.legis.state.wv.us. In summary, all licensees who dispense Schedule II, III, and IV controlled substances to residents of WV must provide the dispensing information to the WV Board of Pharmacy (BOP) at least every 24 hours. All licensed prescribers must check the PDMP at the initiation of opioid therapy and at a minimum of every year thereafter. A physician working in a licensed pain management clinic must check the PDMP at the initiation of the controlled substance therapy and at a minimum of every 90 days thereafter. 22 

The West Virginia Controlled Substance Monitoring Program (CSMP) is available at: www.csapp.wv.gov/Account/Login.aspx

10. Urine Drug Screening/Testing

Urine drug screening/testing is important in the monitoring of compliance with prescribed medications and detecting the use of illicit substances. All healthcare professionals need the most up-to-date and comprehensive medication information (i.e., prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, herbals, supplements, illicit substances, etc.) to improve a patient’s longevity and quality of life. The timing of the urine drug screening/testing needs to be in line with the results available before or at the point of treatment decisions.

Consequences of Unintended Urine Drug Screening/Testing Results

It is important to note that urine drug tests do not provide information on how much or what doses of opioids were taken. If there are unintended urine drug screening or testing results, a careful reassessment of the treatment plan must be completed. A patient’s failure to adhere to the patient and provider agreement is not necessarily proof of abuse or diversion because it may be a result of inadequate pain relief, confusion regarding the prescription(s), a language barrier, or economic concerns. If uncertainty exists regarding the nature of the unintended result, the provider(s) may consider arranging for an in-person meeting in order to have a non-judgmental conversation to clarify the patient’s actions and concerns. If abuse or diversion is confirmed, treatment can continue with alternative therapies and consultation with a substance use disorder (addiction) specialist or psychiatrist and/or referral to a substance use disorder treatment program and/or law enforcement (if concern for the safety of others exists) should be considered.

11. Pill Counts

Randomized and/or scheduled Pill Counts are one way of attempting to improve proper medication adherence and prevent and/or detect medication diversion. Any patient who refuses to provide their medication for a random or scheduled pill count can be considered for discontinuation of that particular or any controlled substance or non-scheduled medication(s) while continuing treatment with alternative therapies. It is recommended to schedule any appointment-based pill counts (and the appointment itself) within a minimum of 3 to 5 days of when the current prescription will run out of supply or refills.

  • Process [One staff person will be assigned to 23]
    1. Bring the patient to a private area of the clinic
    2. Ensure that a staff person is present to witness this procedure
    3. Request that the patient submit their medication to be counted and/or examined
    4. Receive the medication from the patient
    5. Count the medication on a clean flat surface using sterile gloves or equipment.
    6. Examine the color, shape and imprint of the tablet to ensure the medication is the same as prescribed. 
      1. If the medication is a capsule, the staff person shall examine the content of at least two capsules to ensure that the content has not been substituted. 
      2. If the color, shape, or imprint is questionable or the staff does not recognize the medication, the staff person shall verify the color, shape, and imprint of the tablet or capsule through a reputable pill identification resource or against the description on the prescription bottle, if available.
    7. Document the requested pill count, outcome, and witness’s name in the patient’s record.
    8. Advise the provider(s) of the outcome of the pill count.

Special Scenarios

Providers who are advised by their patient that the medication was lost, destroyed, or stolen shall: 23

  • Instruct the patient to better secure their medication in the future.
  • (If lost in fire) Retain a copy of any fire report (reflecting that a fire occurred) to be placed in the patient’s medical record.
  • (If stolen) Retain a copy of any law enforcement report (reflecting the theft) to be placed in the patient’s medical record.
  • Replacement of lost or stolen medication is at the discretion of the provider and/or based upon the patient & provider(s) agreement.
12. Controlled Substance Red Flags

Healthcare professionals have an ethical and legal obligation to both prevent prescription drugs from being diverted to nonmedical uses and to ensure patients receive safe and effective care involving healthcare professionals practicing in the usual course of their professional practice and treating a patient’s legitimate medical condition. The National Opioid Settlement expanded upon previous guidance from the US DEA about “Red Flags” to watch out for as healthcare professionals to ensure a comprehensive care plan is in place. It is essential to note that a Red Flag does not render the prescription illegitimate, but rather indicates a need for resolution of the Red Flag prior to the patient receiving the medication. 24

  • Patient
    1. Controlled Substance (CS) two occasions where refills too soon by >3 days
    2. Doctor Shopping
    3. Prescriber has >10 documented CS refusals within 6 months
    4. Three previous other CS from multiple prescribers with overlapping days within 30 days
    5. Distance between patient’s residence and pharmacy >50 miles
    6. Distance between patient’s residence and prescriber >100 miles
    7. Two previous CS refusals within 30 days
    8. Cash pay despite having prescription insurance coverage
    9. Three or more patients appear together for the same CS
    10. Slang term medication request
    11. Patient appears visibly altered, intoxicated, or incoherent.
  • Prescriber
    1. Prescriber utilizes preprinted or stamped prescription pads
    2. Prescriber has no office within 50 miles of pharmacy
    3. Prescription written for controlled substance class II + Benzodiazepine + Carisoprodol
  • Prescription
    1. Fails to meet legal requirements of a prescription
    2. Misspellings
    3. Atypical abbreviations
    4. Multiple colors of ink or handwritings

Additionally, the Board of Pharmacy runs reports to identify abnormal prescribing. If a prescriber is among the top 5% in 4 of the 5 categories below, they are flagged as abnormal prescribers. The Board reviews the report and identifies prescribers who are prescribing abnormally, and these prescribers are then referred to their respective boards of medicine.

  • Indicators for outliers:
    1. Number of CII opioids prescribed
    2. Average MME per prescription
    3. Total MME prescribed in the quarter
    4. Overlapping opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions
    5. Total opioid patients
Clinical Treatment of Pain
1. Descriptions & Examples of Types of Pain
  • Nociceptive Pain
    • General Description:
      • Pain arising from noxious stimuli affecting thermal, mechanical, or chemical receptors (nociceptors) in normal tissues.
    • General Examples:
      • Arthritis, mechanical lower back pain, post-operative pain, sports/exercise injury, etc.
    • Somatic Nociceptive Pain
      • Description: Outer organs, body walls, & limbs (bone/joints/muscle/skin) producing aching or throbbing, and is well localized.
      • Examples: Ankle sprain, incisional pain, etc.
    • Visceral Nociceptive Pain
      • Description: Internal organs; all thoraco-abdominal organs
      • Examples: Localized tumor or hollow viscus, IBS, myocardial infarction, etc.
  • Neuropathic Pain
    • General Description:
      • Abnormal processing of sensory input by the Central Nervous System (CNS) and/or Peripheral Nervous System (PNS)
    • General Examples:
      • Neuropathic Lower back pain, etc.
    • Central Neuropathic Pain
      • Deafferentation
        • Injury to either the CNS or the PNS
        • Phantom pain (PNS) & burning pain below spinal cord injury/lesion (CNS)
      • Sympathetic
        • Dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system
        • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS)
    • Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
      • Polyneuropathies
        • Pain is felt along the distribution of many peripheral nerves
        • Diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, Guillain-Barre Syndrome pains, or alcohol-nutritional neuropathy
      • Mononeuropathies
        • Usually associated with a known peripheral nerve injury, and pain is felt at least partly along the damaged nerve
        • Nerve root compression, nerve entrapment, trigeminal neuralgia
  • Mixed Pain
    • General Description:
      • Combination of nociceptive and neuropathic pains
    • General Examples:
      • Fibromyalgia, headache, lower back pain, myofascial pain syndrome, or skeletal muscle pain, etc.
2. Pain Treatment Algorithms

The following clinical pain management treatment algorithms intend to provide the best course of action for progression through escalating levels of pain management. These algorithms are intended to be used in conjunction with the 2022 CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain. 12 Not every single entity must be attempted to progress to the next level, as every patient is unique; however, attempts to reduce a patient’s pain and improve their daily function should follow the recommended treatment algorithm as closely as possible to provide the safest and most effective pain management for every patient. For instance, not every non-pharmacological treatment option must be attempted before progressing forward within each clinical treatment algorithm. However, a reasonable attempt should be made to try as many of the earliest treatment algorithm options as possible before progressing further. Whether considering or absolutely referring to a pain management specialist, the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA), American Board of Pain Medicine (ABPM), or the American Board of Interventional Pain Physicians (ABIPP) have established and distinguished certifications.

Nociceptive Pain Prescribing Algorithm

1st Line

Non-Pharmacological (Active & Passive)

OTC APAP then +/- NSAID*

Topical Agent (NSAID, lidocaine, or capsaicin)

2nd Line

SNRIs (duloxetine, venlafaxine, etc.)

TCAs (2° Class: nortriptyline, etc.)

Controlled Substance Class 4 (tramadol or pentazocine/naloxone)

Consider Referral to Specialist

Combination 1St & 2ND Line Agents

Acute Add-On: Muscle Relaxer PRN ** (Antispasticity Sub-Class)

Controlled Substance Class 3 (buprenorphine or APAP/codeine)

lnterventional Therapy

Controlled Substance Class 2 (IR)

Referral to Specialist Needed

Spinal Cord/Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation

Controlled Substance Class 2 (ER)

Implantable/Intrathecal (IT) morphine/baclofen/ziconotide

Consider Clinical Trial

ATTENTION:

  • Start at lowest dose and slowly taper up to maximum dose of one agent before adding or starting another drug.
  • Depending on patient specifics, can maneuver within Line/Color Zones
  • Intrathecal opioids are more effective than oral in patients unsuccessful on oral opioids.
  • *Based on GI/Cardio Patient History
  • **Watch for concominant CNS Depression

ABBREVIATIONS:

  • OTC: Over-The-Counter
  • APAP: Acetaminophen
  • NSAID: Non-Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drug
  • ASA: Aspirin
  • IBU: Ibuprofen
  • SNRI: Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor
  • TCA: Tryclic Antidepressant
  • IR: Immediate Release
  • PRN: As Needed

Neuropathic Pain Prescribing Algorithm

1st Line

Non-Pharmacological (Active & Passive)

Acute Trial of NSAlD*/APAP

Add-On Topical Agent (lidocaine or capsaicin)

L-methylfolate

Gabapentinoids (gabapentin** or pregabalin)

SNRIs (duloxetine, venlafaxine, etc.)

TCAs (2° Class: nortriptyline, etc.)

2nd Line

Anti-Epileptic Drugs or AEDs (CBZ***, VPA, lamotrigine, topiramate, etc.)

Controlled Substance Class 4 (tramadol or pentazocine/naloxone)

Consider Referral to Specialist

Combination 1St & 2ND Line Agents

Acute Add-On: Muscle Relaxer PRN **** (Antispasticity Sub-Class)

Controlled Substance Class 3 (buprenorphine or APAP/codeine)

lnterventional Therapy

Controlled Substance Class 2 (IR)

Referral to Specialist Needed

Spinal Cord/Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation

Controlled Substance Class 2 (ER)

Implantable/Intrathecal (IT) morphine/baclofen/ziconotide

Botox Injection***

Consider Clinical Trial

ATTENTION:

  • Start at lowest dose and slowly taper up to maximum dose of one agent before adding or starting another drug.
  • Depending on patient specifics, can maneuver within Line/Color Zones
  • Intrathecal opioids are more effective than oral in patients unsuccessful on oral opioids.
  • *Based on GI/Cardio Patient History
  • **Abuse Potential as a non-controlled substance Trigeminal Neuralgia only
  • **** Watch for cocominant CNS Depression

ABBREVIATIONS:

  • NSAID: Non-Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drug
  • APAP: Acetaminophen
  • SNRI: Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor
  • TCA: Tryclic Antidepressant
  • AEDs: Anti-Epileptic Drugs
  • CBZ: Carbemazepine
  • VLP: Valporic Acid
  • PRN: As Needed
  • IR: Immediate Release

Mixed Pain (Neuropathic & Nociceptive) Prescribing Algorithm

1st Line

Non-Pharmacological (Active & Passive)

Acute Trial of NSAlD*/APAP

Topical Agent (NSAID, lidocaine, or capsaicin)

2nd Line

Gabapentinoids (gabapentin** or pregabalin)

SNRIs (duloxetine, venlafaxine, etc.)

TCAs (2° Class: nortriptyline, etc.)

Controlled Substance Class 4 (tramadol or pentazocine/naloxone)

Consider Referral to Specialist

Combo Therapy of 1ST & 2ND Line

Acute Add-On: Muscle Relaxer PRN **** (Antispasticity Sub-Class)

Controlled Substance Class 3 (buprenorphine or APAP/codeine)

lnterventional Therapy

Controlled Substance Class 2 (IR)

Referral to Specialist Needed

Spinal Cord or Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation

Controlled Substance Class 2 (ER)

Implantable/Intrathecal (IT) morphine/baclofen/ziconotide

Consider Clinical Trial

ATTENTION:

  • Start at lowest dose and slowly taper up to maximum dose of one agent before adding or starting another drug.
  • Depending on patient specifics, can maneuver within Line/Color Zones
  • Intrathecal opioids are more effective than oral in patients unsuccessful on oral opioids.
  • *Based on GI/Cardio Patient History
  • **Abuse Potential as a non-controlled substance Trigeminal Neuralgia only
  • *** Watch for cocominant CNS Depression

ABBREVIATIONS:

  • OTC: Over-The-Counter
  • APAP: Acetaminophen
  • NSAID: Non-Steroidal Anti Inflammatory Drug
  • ASA: Aspirin
  • IBU: Ibuprofen
  • TCA: Tryclic Antidepressant
  • SNRI: Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor
  • TRC: Trycyclic Antidepressant
  • PRN: As Needed
  • IR: Immediate Release
  • Non-Pharmacologic Treatment Options (Appendix 10.0)
    • Active & Passive Therapies
  • Pharmacologic Treatment Options (Appendix 11.0)
    • Non-Opioids, Opioids, & Herbals and Supplements
Safe & Appropriate Opioid Use

(Suggestions in addition to clinical treatment algorithms and overall guidance)

  1. Reduction in average Morphine Milligram Equivalents per day (MME/Day).
    • If continuing opioid use > 50 MME/Day, opioid tapering or pain management specialist referral is suggested. Risk-to-benefit ratio increases as doses increase to >50 MME/Day. 12
    • Established patients already on these relatively higher opioid daily doses should be offered the opportunity to reevaluate their pain management treatment plan in light of the association of opioid dosage and overdose risk.
  2. Avoidance of combinations of opioids, benzodiazepines, muscle relaxers, and/or hypnotics due to the severity of drug-drug interactions and increased chance for side effects. **
  3. Preferred use of IR (immediate-release) compared to ER (extended-release) opioids, but when ER opioids are appropriate and selected, the abuse-deterrent formulations are preferred.
  4. When a person does experience a non-life-ending overdose from a prescription opioid medication, the respective prescriber should be notified as soon as time permits, to follow up with reassessment of risk assessment and course of treatment, along with evaluation of possible substance use disorder.

To ensure safe and effective pain management, laws and legislative rules have been enacted in WV to update continuing education (CME, CPE, CE, etc.) requirements and to define the scope of a pain clinic. Highlights of these laws and legislative rules are included in Appendix 12.0. The full text of the code provisions is available online at www.legis.state.wv.us.22 The full text of the legislative rules is available online at https://apps.sos.wv.gov/adlaw/csr/.

*Evidence is insufficient to determine the effectiveness of long-term opioid therapy for reducing chronic pain and increasing daily function. Evidence supports a dose-dependent risk for serious harms. 25

**Overdose from benzodiazepines steadily rose from 1996 to 2010, parallel to the amount of benzodiazepines prescribed and dispensed (Appendix 13.1), similar to that parallel correlation of the amount of opioids sold compared to opioid overdoses in the same time frame (Appendix 13.2). Benzodiazepine overdose has plateaued since 2010. However, opioid overdoses have consistently increased. 26 Appendix 13.0

CDC Opioid-Prescribing Guidelines (2022)

Determining Whether or Not to Initiate Opioids for Pain

  1. Nonopioid therapies are at least as effective as opioids for many common types of acute pain. Clinicians should maximize use of nonpharmacologic and nonopioid pharmacologic therapies as appropriate for the specific condition and patient and only consider opioid therapy for acute pain if benefits are anticipated to outweigh risks to the patient. Before prescribing opioid therapy for acute pain, clinicians should discuss with patients the realistic benefits and known risks of opioid therapy.
  2. Nonopioid therapies are preferred for subacute and chronic pain. Clinicians should maximize use of nonpharmacologic and nonopioid pharmacologic therapies as appropriate for the specific condition and patient and only consider initiating opioid therapy if expected benefits for pain and function are anticipated to outweigh risks to the patient. Before starting opioid therapy for subacute or chronic pain, clinicians should discuss with patients the realistic benefits and known risks of opioid therapy, should work with patients to establish treatment goals for pain and function, and should consider how opioid therapy will be discontinued if benefits do not outweigh risks.

Selecting Opioids and Determining Opioid Dosages

  1. When starting opioid therapy for acute, subacute, or chronic pain, clinicians should prescribe immediate-release opioids instead of extended-release and long-acting (ER/LA) opioids.
  2. When opioids are initiated for opioid-naïve patients with acute, subacute, or chronic pain, clinicians should prescribe the lowest effective dosage. If opioids are continued for subacute or chronic pain, clinicians should use caution when prescribing opioids at any dosage, should carefully evaluate individual benefits and risks when considering increasing dosage, and should avoid increasing dosage above levels likely to yield diminishing returns in benefits relative to risks to patients.
  3. For patients already receiving opioid therapy, clinicians should carefully weigh benefits and risks and exercise care when changing opioid dosage. If benefits outweigh risks of continued opioid therapy, clinicians should work closely with patients to optimize nonopioid therapies while continuing opioid therapy. If benefits do not outweigh risks of continued opioid therapy, clinicians should optimize other therapies and work closely with patients to gradually taper to lower dosages or, if warranted based on the individual circumstances of the patient, appropriately taper and discontinue opioids. Unless there are indications of a life-threatening issue, such as warning signs of impending overdose (e.g., confusion, sedation, or slurred speech), opioid therapy should not be discontinued abruptly, and clinicians should not rapidly reduce opioid dosages from higher dosages.

Deciding Duration of Initial Opioid Prescription and Conducting Follow-Up

  1. When opioids are needed for acute pain, clinicians should prescribe no greater quantity than needed for the expected duration of pain severe enough to require opioids.
  2. Clinicians should evaluate benefits and risks with patients within 1–4 weeks of starting opioid therapy for subacute or chronic pain or of dosage escalation. Clinicians should regularly reevaluate benefits and risks of continued opioid therapy with patients.

Assessing Risk and Addressing Potential Harms of Opioid Use

  1. Before starting and periodically during continuation of opioid therapy, clinicians should evaluate risk for opioid-related harms and discuss risk with patients. Clinicians should work with patients to incorporate into the management plan strategies to mitigate risk, including offering naloxone.
  2. When prescribing initial opioid therapy for acute, subacute, or chronic pain, and periodically during opioid therapy for chronic pain, clinicians should review the patient’s history of controlled substance prescriptions using state prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) data to determine whether the patient is receiving opioid dosages or combinations that put the patient at high risk for overdose.
  3. When prescribing opioids for subacute or chronic pain, clinicians should consider the benefits and risks of toxicology testing to assess for prescribed medications as well as other prescribed and nonprescribed controlled substances.
  4. Clinicians should use particular caution when prescribing opioid pain medication and benzodiazepines concurrently and consider whether benefits outweigh risks of concurrent prescribing of opioids and other central nervous system depressants.
  5. Clinicians should offer or arrange treatment with evidence-based medications to treat patients with opioid use disorder. Detoxification on its own, without medications for opioid use disorder, is not recommended for opioid use disorder because of increased risks for resuming drug use, overdose, and overdose death.

*All recommendations are category A, which indicates that most patients should receive the recommended course of action, except recommendations 1, 5, 9, 10, and 11. (designated category B, with individual decision making required). 12

Healthcare Professional Responsibility of Safety

The most important concept underlying these pain management guidelines is the intention to provide the highest level of appropriate, effective, and safe pain management for every patient. It is the responsibility of all healthcare professionals to collaborate at the highest level of care to not only “do no harm” but also effectively and safely take care of a patient’s healthcare needs, considering all available resources. These guidelines are based upon the best available evidence and clinical experience of the panel and task force at the time of development and updating. These guidelines are intended to serve solely as guidelines and are intended only to conceptualize means to address patient, prescriber, and dispenser safety and should not be interpreted as any applicable standard of care. Rather, these guidelines serve solely as a resource for providers as the treatment of chronic pain may evolve more toward utilization of evidence-based therapies.

Conclusion

While significant improvement in opioid prescribing practices have been made, it is the duty of healthcare professionals to ensure history does not repeat itself.  Ongoing efforts to ensure patient’s pain is effectively treated while managing associated risks of opioid treatment options must continue.  The work of the expert panel and task force is intended not only to provide a risk reduction and mitigation process but ultimately to improve patient care and preserve human lives. By collaborating and utilizing the steps within the proposed risk reduction process and the clinical pain treatment algorithms, healthcare professionals can best serve the needs of patients going beyond “do no harm” to provide appropriate, safe, and effective care. All healthcare professionals have a corresponding responsibility to not only ensure that any medication, particularly controlled substances, is issued for a legitimate medical purpose by an individual practitioner acting in the usual course of their professional practice, but also to ensure diligent patient care in general. Inherent within this concept, and this pain management guidance overall, is an effort of teamwork amongst healthcare professionals to seek additional professional opinions when appropriate, and ultimately to ensure the highest level of patient care. Continued healthcare professional education can enable these professionals to educate the general population, and as a result, we, as a society, will make significant strides in addressing this impactful issue of epidemic proportions.

This clinical practice guideline updates and expands the recommendations in the  2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain, using the best available evidence as interpreted and informed by expert opinion, while attending to the values and preferences expressed by patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Although the strength of the evidence is sometimes low quality and research gaps remain, clinical scientific evidence continues to advance and supports the recommendations in this clinical practice guideline. The principal aim of this clinical practice guideline is to ensure persons have equitable access to safe and effective pain management that improves their function and quality of life while illuminating and reducing risks associated with prescription opioids.

References
  1. Rikard S, Strahan A, Schmit K, Guy Jr J. Chronic Pain Among Adults. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72:379-385.
  2. Gaskin D, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain. 2012;13(8):715-724.
  3. Manchikanti L, Fellows B, Ailinani H, Pampati V. Therapeuic use, abuse, and nonmedical use of opioids: a ten-year perspective. Pain Physician. 2010;13(5):401-435.
  4. Administration SAaMHS. The NSDUH Report: Substance Use and Mental Health Estimates from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Overview of Findings. Rockville,MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quaity; 2014.
  5. Rudd R, Aleshire N, Zibbell J, Gladden R. Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths — United States, 2000-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Jan 2016;64(50-51):1378-1382.
  6. Ahmad F, Cisewski J, Rossen L, Sutton P. Provisional drug overdose death counts.: National Center of Health Statistics; 2025.
  7. Percent Change in Predicted 12 Month-ending Count of Drug Overdose Deaths, by Jurisdiction: December 2023 to December 2024. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm. Accessed May 15, 2025.
  8. Lanser P, Gesell S. Pain management; the fifth vital sign. Healthc Benchmarks. 2001;8(6):68-62.
  9. Paulozzi L, Budnitz D, Xi Y. Increasing deaths from opioid analgesics in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15(9):618-627.
  10. Garnett M, Minino A. Changes in drug overdose mortality and selected drug type by state: United States, 2022 to 2023. NCHS Health E-stats. 2025.
  11. Staff C. Prescription Drug Overdose: Prevention for states: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017.
  12. Dowell D, Ragan K, Jones C, Baldwin G, Chou R. CDC Clinical Practice Guideine for Prescribing Opioids for Pain — United States, 2022. MMWR. 2022;71(No. RR-3):1-95.
  13. Chou R, Fanciullo G, Fine P, Adler J, Ballantyne J, Davies P. Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. J Pain. 2009;10(2):113-130.
  14. Belle D, Singh H. Genetic Factors in Drug Metabolism. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(11):1553-1560.
  15. Congress US. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; 2008.
  16. Interagency Guideline on Prescribing Opioids for Pain. Washington State Agency Medical Directors’ Group. June 2015. www.agencymeddirectors.wa.gov. Accessed June 26, 2024.
  17. Krebs E, Lorenz K, Bair M. Development and initial validation of the PEG, a three-item scale assessing pain intensity and interference. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(6):733-738.
  18. Narcan Package Insert: ADAPT Pharma, Inc; 2015.
  19. Opvee Package Insert: Opiant Pharmaceuticals; 2023.
  20. Nalmefene. Drug Facts and Comparisons. May 5, 2025. Accessed June 23, 2024.
  21. West Virginia Code §16-46-1, et seq.(Accessed August 27, 2025). www.wvlegislature.gov
  22. West Virginia Code §§16B-7-1 et seq., 60A-9-1 et seq. (Accessed August 27, 2025). www.wvlegislature.gov
  23. Counting patient’s medication protocol sample. Doctors Safeguard. 2011. http://www.doctorssafeguard.com/info/PAP/Pill%20Count%20Protocol%20-.
  24. National Opioid Litigation: Settlement Agreements as of January 2025 2025.
  25. Chou R, Turner J, Devine E. The effectiveness and risks of lpng-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(4):276-286.
  26. Bachhuber M, Hennessy S, Cunningham C. Increasing benzodiazepine prescriptions and overdose mortality in the United States, 1996-2013. Am J Public Health. March 2016;106(4):686-688.
  27. Canadian guideline for safe and effective use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: version 5.6: National Opioid Use Guideline Group; 2010.
  28. Use of Opioids in the Management of Chronic Pain Work Group. VA/DoD clinical practice guidelines for the use of opioids in the management of chronic pain: version 4.0. Department of Veteran Affairs and Department of Defence. May 2022. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/Pain/cot/VADoDOpioidsCPG.pdf.. Accessed July 9, 2024.
  29. World Health Organization (WHO) Analgesic Ladder. Winnipeg Regional Health Authority. July 26, 2014. https://professionals.wrha.mb.ca/old/professionals/files/PDTip_AnalgesicLadder.pdf.
  30. Brennan M, Heit H. Chronic pain: overcoming treatment barriers for effective outcomes. Medscape. December 2004.
  31. Derry C, Derry S, Moore R. Single dose oral ibuprofen plus paracetamol (acetaminophen) for acute postoperatice pain. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013.
  32. Feinberg S, Mackey S. ACPA – Stanford resourse guide to chronic pan management: an integrated guide to comprehensive pain therapies [updated 2024]: American Chronic Pain Association and Stanford University Division of Pain Medicine; 2024.
  33. Hegmann K, Weiss M, Bowden K, Branco F, DuBrueler K, Els C. ACOEM practice guidelines: opioids for treatment of acute, subacute, chronic and postoperative pain. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(12):e143-e159.
  34. Hooten W, Timming R, Belgrade M, Gaul J, Goertz M, Haake B. Assessment and management of chronic pain [updated November 2013]: Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement.
  35. Manchikanti L, Abdi S, Atluri S, Balog C, Benyamin R, Boswell M. American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) guidelines for responsible opioid prescribing in chronic non-cancer pain: Part 2 — guidance. Pain Physician. 2012;15(3 Suppl):S67-S116.
  36. Marcus D. Treatment of nonmalignant chronic pain. Am Fam Physician. 200;61(5):1331-1346.
  37. Nuckols T, Anderson L, Popescu I, Diamant A, Doyle B, Capua P. OPioid prescribing: a systematc review and critical appraisal of guidelines for chronic pain. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(1):38-47.
  38. Rolfs R. Utah clinical guidelines on prescribing opioids for treatment of pain. Utah Department of Health. February 2009. https://dopl.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/opioid-guidlines.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2024.
  39. Schug S, Goddard C. Recent advances in the pharmacological management of acute and chronic pain. Ann Palliat Med. 2014;3(4):263-275.
  40. Staff F. Disposal of Unused Medicines: What you should know: U.S. Food and Drug Administration.; 2020.
  41. Staff N. Safe medicine storage and disposal: BeMedWise Program at NeedyMeds; 2020.
  42. Staff USFaDA. FDA approves first over-the-counter naloxone nasal spray. March 29, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-over-counter-naloxone-nasal-spray. Accessed July 9, 2024.
  43. Teater D. Evidence for the efficacy of pain medications. National Safety Council. 2014. https://www.nsc.org/getmedia/8ecdc0e5-ae58-43e8-b98b-46c205e1c2b2/evidence-efficacy-pain-medication.pdf. Accessed July 8, 2024.
  44. Umer A, Watson E, Lilly C. Substance Exposure and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J Pediatr. 2023;256:70-76.
  45. University B. Mandating PDMP participation by medical providers: current status and experience in selected states. Boston MA: PDMP Center of Excellence at Brandeis University; 2014.
Open Appendix in New Tab ↗